 Louisville MSD IWD OCPSF
Project Permits – Louisville and Jefferson Counties, KY
The Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan
Sewer District (MSD) retained Strand to assist their
Industrial Waste Department (IWD) in the development of
pretreatment permits for a number of Organic Chemical,
Plastics, and Synthetic Fiber (OCPSF) Industries. MSD
owns and operates many treatment facilities throughout
Jefferson County, Kentucky, the largest of which is the
105 mgd Morris Forman WWTP. Tributary to the Morris
Forman WWTP are five significant OCPSF industries, Rohm
& Haas (ADF = 1.0 mgd), DuPont (ADF = 2.0 mgd), Geon/BF
Goodrich/Zeon (ADF = 2.2 mgd), Engelhard (ADF = 0.6
mgd), and Akzo Coatings (ADF = 0.003 mgd).
All OCPSF
industries are regulated under 40 CFR Part 414, and
the general pretreatment standards 40 CFR Part 403. The
Part 414 Regulations have been very controversial since
their inception. Many changes have been made to the
Part 414 Regulation including repeal and remand of
several pollutants. The Part 414 regulations are
especially difficult to administer because they require
mass-based permit limits that are developed based on
long-term average regulated flow, as opposed to a
production basis. The calculation of the long-term
average flow requires intimate familiarity with the
entire facility and all waste streams such that only
regulated waste streams are included in the long-term
average flow. As a result, unique approaches in
determining regulated flows are necessary in order to
ensure that dilution and unregulated flows are not
included in the long-term average flow calculation.
We were
retained to provide the regulatory expertise required to
perform field analyses to determine a technically
correct limit setting methodology, and to determine
discharge permit limits. Our approach to the project
resulted in the restoration of a cooperative
relationship between the industries and MSD. The
industries were required to install flow metering
devices to allow the long-term average flow to be
measured. The resulting mass-based permits are
technically correct and both industry and MSD will rely
on the flows used in determining the permit limits.
This project was highly successful because both MSD and
the industries accepted the limit setting methodology and the
resulting permits.
back to top
|